Loading... Please wait...

Our Newsletter

Subscribe below,
or read our archive.

(Note if you have had this page open for a while, you should reload it before submitting this form as the Captcha check can time out).








This article is one of more than 170 articles on digital imaging provided free by Image Science.
Read about How You Can Support Image Science.

Optical Brighteners
Article Details

Last Updated
28th of November, 2011

Optical Brighteners (often referred to as OBs, or Fluorescent Whitening Agents - FWAs) are chemicals used in many contexts - for example, they are put into detergents to achieve brighter whites and stronger colours. Toothpaste is another common place they are found.

OBs convert light through fluorescence, right at the far blue edge of the visible spectrum (i.e. UV light) into visible light, thus making whites appear cooler and brighter, and colours more saturated. This is done for marketing reasons (i.e. look at our lovely bright whites) and also to allow the manufacturer some tolerance in the paper making process (e.g. if the paper base of a particular batch is a little more yellow than spec, OBs can be used to cheaply bring the paper to a consistent state).

The jury is still out for many people on whether OBs are of real practical significance when considering the longevity of a print. Some people believe OBs will simply fade away over time, leaving the paper no warmer than it would have been anyway, and no warmer than papers originally sold without them. Others believe the chemicals are likely to have an effect on the long term survival of a paper (either causing greater degradation over time, or leaving the paper more yellow than it would have been were the OBs never present), and thus should be avoided at all costs. Some people just don't like warmer papers and so are willing to accept OBs no matter what the cost!

The reality is that many prints made by great printers of days past, people like Ansel Adams, were made on papers with OBs in them. Undoubtedly they have a different visual appearance today to prints made on papers that never had OBs in them, but it turns out that many of these prints are still the preferred prints today! The character they have taken on (through the OBs fading) is actually still appreciated! Thus, as usual, the answer is not simple.

However, in terms of colour management, OBs are a definite problem. Firstly, then tend to promote metamerism, making colour casts on black and white prints under different light sources much worse, and they also mean that what you print now will not be what is on the page in a few years (as OBs fade much more quickly than paper coatings without them)...thus all your good work in colour management is negated after just a few years if you use papers with OBs in them. It may be the fading is very minor, so this may not be a real practical problem, of course, but some very bright white papers have a LOT of OBs in them (e.g. a lot of the Epson papers) so these should definitely be avoided.

If in doubt, and particularly in the gallery market, it is probably best to avoid them, or at least papers that have lots of them in them. Papers like Portfolio Rag, Silver Rag, and most of the Canson papers have only minimal amounts at most, or generally none at all, and are often still really quite a bright white.

File Attachments
No file attachments were found.
These Articles May Be Related...